On 11/9/18 6:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> The nightly-build-appliance target already tests this particular build.
If I am reading the AB code correctly, it is building for x86-64 where
as this is for x86. A QA person would say they are not the same.
Are the resulting build results testing the same thing?
- armin
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
> meta/lib/oeqa/manual/build-appliance.json | 26 -----------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/manual/build-appliance.json
> b/meta/lib/oeqa/manual/build-appliance.json
> index b8f89275d08..70f8c72c9bb 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/manual/build-appliance.json
> +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/manual/build-appliance.json
> @@ -1,30 +1,4 @@
> [
> - {
> - "test": {
> - "@alias":
> "build-appliance.build-appliance.Bitbake_build-appliance-image",
> - "author": [
> - {
> - "email": "alexandru.c.george...@intel.com",
> - "name": "alexandru.c.george...@intel.com"
> - }
> - ],
> - "execution": {
> - "1": {
> - "action": "Get poky source code and prepare the build
> environment",
> - "expected_results": "bitbake build-appliance-image is
> successful "
> - },
> - "2": {
> - "action": "Set MACHINE to qemux86 and add the following
> line to conf/local.conf : SRCREV_pn-build-appliance-image = \"${AUTOREV}\"",
> - "expected_results": ""
> - },
> - "3": {
> - "action": "Run \"bitbake build-appliance-image\" \n \n",
> - "expected_results": ""
> - }
> - },
> - "summary": "Bitbake_build-appliance-image"
> - }
> - },
> {
> "test": {
> "@alias":
> "build-appliance.build-appliance.Build_core-image-minimal_with_build-appliance-image",
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
