Op 9 nov. 2011, om 10:37 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 10:27 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 9 nov. 2011, om 01:53 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven: >> >>> This patch pulls in the gnome related classes from oe-core which >>> adds extra packaging rules and functionality whilst modularising things >>> so that one can get a subset of gnome functionality without adding a lot >>> of extra dependencies. >>> >>> These aren't an exact copy of the classes from meta-openembedded, notable >>> differences are: >>> * gnome.bbclass - I dropped the BBCLASSEXTEND >> >> It looks that will break a number of things in meta-oe, why was it dropped? > > Unconditionally BBCLASSEXTENDing everything gnome is a great way to hack > around build issues and create a convoluted dependency mess that isn't > really required. I'd much rather we try and minimise the amount of > -native dependencies to those actually needed. > > Comparing our builds against other systems its becoming clear our > convoluted dependency trees are one of the areas we don't do as well and > it hurts performance :(.
The list of -native needed in meta-gnome: bison-native cairo-native docbook-utils-native flex-native gconf-native gdk-pixbuf-native glib-2.0-native gnome-doc-utils-native gobject-introspection-native gtk-doc-native icon-naming-utils-native intltool-native libffi-native libidl-native libxml-parser-perl-native orbit2-native pango-native perl-native popt-native python-native regards, Koen
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
