Hi RP,
Is it necessary to split multiple sub dbg packages or only
one dbg is allowed? If the former, this fix makes sense.
I know in oe-core, almost one dbg package per recipe, but
in oe, 21 recipes have extra sub dbg package and 18 of them
did not set NOAUTOPACKAGEDEBUG = "1".
So rather than modify them one by one tediously, how about to
improve auto debug package splitting order? If ${PN}-dbg exists,
split the unsplit debug file to ${PN}-dbg, if ${PN}-dbg does not
exist, still split them to first dbg package.
//Hongxu
The following changes since commit d180dc758710c7259d45eeb9304e7284a8fd8825:
oeqa/selftest/recipetool: fix non-determinism in cmake test (2018-09-13
16:28:26 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib hongxu/dbg-split
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=hongxu/dbg-split
Hongxu Jia (2):
package.bbclass: improve auto debug package splitting order
selftest/package: improve case to test debug package splitting
.../selftest-hardlink/selftest-hardlink.bb | 4 +++-
meta/classes/package.bbclass | 10 +++++++-
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/package.py | 27 ++++++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
