A recent binutils patch added the LDGOLD variable but its already used
for controlling EXTRA_OECONF options for gold. Separate the two variables
to different names to avoid build warnings and confusion.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
index b56fcd4cd01..81ecbb50cc1 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ FILES_${PN}-dev = " \
# Rather than duplicating multiple entries for these, make one
# list and reuse it.
-LDGOLD ?= "ld.gold dwp"
-LDGOLD_riscv64 = ""
+LDGOLD_ALTS ?= "ld.gold dwp"
+LDGOLD_ALTS_riscv64 = ""
USE_ALTERNATIVES_FOR = " \
addr2line \
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ USE_ALTERNATIVES_FOR = " \
gprof \
ld \
ld.bfd \
- ${LDGOLD} \
+ ${LDGOLD_ALTS} \
nm \
objcopy \
objdump \
--
2.17.1
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
