Any comment about this RFC? Should I send rebased version?
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:58 PM Otavio Salvador < otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > Hello Martin, > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> > wrote: > ... > > This RFC doesn't implement it all, but it makes naming all the artifacts > in > > consistent way a bit easier. If there is an agreement that OE should > support > > the naming scenario described above, I'll submit the rest of the changes. > > I think it all makes sense and if we preserve current behavior as > default I see it as a very good addition :-) > > I didn't test the patches myself and I'd like to do a more extensive > test once you send the full patchset. > > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 >
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
