On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 12:01 -0400, Hongzhi.Song wrote: > We are going to let runtime test support kernel tests. Now we just > add > kernel self-contained sample tests. And we plan to add overall kernel > tests in the future. > > This patch is just add kernel samples test which contains about 13 > tests > enabled by kernel-sample.scc. So it needs statement, > KERNEL_FEATURES_append += " kernel-sample/kernel-sample.scc" in > local.conf. > > Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song <hongzhi.s...@windriver.com> > --- > meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/ksample.py | 272 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/ksample_abs.py | 272 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 544 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/ksample.py > create mode 100644 meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/ksample_abs.py > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/ksample.py > b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/ksample.py > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..719f1a0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/ksample.py > @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ > +import os > +import time > + > +from oeqa.runtime.case import OERuntimeTestCase > +from oeqa.core.decorator.depends import OETestDepends > +from oeqa.core.decorator.oeid import OETestID > +from oeqa.core.decorator.data import skipIfNotFeature > + > +class KSample(OERuntimeTestCase): > + def send_cmd(self, cmd='', content=''): > + comd = cmd + " " + content > + status, ret = self.target.run(comd) > + msg = '%s failed, %s' % (comd, ret) > + self.assertEqual(status, 0, msg=msg)
Looks much better but KSample appears to be duplicated in the two files. Can you avoid that duplication please! Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
