On Friday 28 October 2011 21:07:44 McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Phil Blundell <ph...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > That logic sounds reasonable, but I think Richard's point was that it's
> > more conventional to use "=+" rather than an override for prepending.
> 
> I sort of forgot that += and =+ are different. Shall I resubmit this patch?

Yes please.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to