On Friday 28 October 2011 21:07:44 McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Phil Blundell <ph...@gnu.org> wrote: > > That logic sounds reasonable, but I think Richard's point was that it's > > more conventional to use "=+" rather than an override for prepending. > > I sort of forgot that += and =+ are different. Shall I resubmit this patch?
Yes please. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core