Upstream-Status typo fixed in contrib/jansa/pyro-backports

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 2:08 AM, Patchwork <
patchw...@patchwork.openembedded.org> wrote:

> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: Backports for pyro (rev3)
> Revision: 3
> URL   : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/8739/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
>
> Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is
> an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed
> series by patchtest resulting in the following failures:
>
>
>
> * Issue             Upstream-Status is in incorrect format
> [test_upstream_status_presence_format]
>   Suggested fix    Fix Upstream-Status format in
> 0001-enable-FL_LPAE-flag-for-armv7ve-cores.patch
>   Current          UpStream-Status: Backport
>   Standard format  Upstream-Status: <Valid status>
>   Valid status     Pending, Accepted, Backport, Denied, Inappropriate
> [reason], Submitted [where]
>
>
>
> If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the
> mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your
> concerns.
> Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a
> new
> version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the
> version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] ->
> [PATCH v3] -> ...).
>
> ---
> Guidelines:     https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_
> Guidelines
> Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest
> Test suite:     http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe
>
>
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to