But shouldn't it at least show different error message in case when
${S}/waf doesn't exist and when it fails to execute it for whatever reason?
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
> On 31 January 2018 at 17:07, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What about the recipes which don't have ${S}/waf at all (and might
>> inherit waf from possibly wrong reasons), like all those waf-samba recipes
>> mentioned before?
>>
>
> If a recipe inherits waf but doesn't use waf I'm absolutely fine with it
> erroring out. Its always bothered me that autotools.bbclass doesn't object
> if configure can't be found.
>
> Ross
>
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
