On 01/18/2018 07:29 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 17:35 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
Two of the patches have been merged, so I rebased others and put them
to:
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib rbt/multilib
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=rbt/
multilib
Robert Yang (10):
staging.bbclass: fix for multilib
populate_sdk_ext.bbclass: fix for multilib
staging.bbclass: staging_populate_sysroot_dir(): fix for multilib
staging.bbclass: print searched manifest when not found
staging.bbclass: extend_recipe_sysroot(): search multilib manifest
package_manager.py: reverse archs correctly
multilib.bbclass: extend allarch recipes
toolchain-scripts.bbclass: only install all MULTILIB_VARIANTS for
image
multilib.bbclass: deltask populate_sdk and populate_sdk_ext
populate_sdk_ext.bbclass: remove the try...finally
Just to update, I also have a set of patches which alter the manifest
code in staging.bbclass, I wanted to compare what we're doing and
likely create a combination of those patches.
For the deltask commit, could you make it bb.build.deltask() only when
image.bbclass is inherited?
Thanks, I updated it in the repo:
diff --git a/meta/classes/multilib.bbclass b/meta/classes/multilib.bbclass
index 770863f..6a79d02 100644
--- a/meta/classes/multilib.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/multilib.bbclass
@@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ python __anonymous () {
d.setVar("LINGUAS_INSTALL", "")
# FIXME, we need to map this to something, not delete it!
d.setVar("PACKAGE_INSTALL_ATTEMPTONLY", "")
+ bb.build.deltask('do_populate_sdk', d)
+ bb.build.deltask('do_populate_sdk_ext', d)
return
clsextend.map_depends_variable("DEPENDS")
But I think that there is no difference since only image recipe has
do_populate_sdk/_ext.
// Robert
Cheers,
Richard
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
