Hi Saul,
On 12/20/2017 04:11 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
We have seen more failures, but have not been able to directly reproduce
it maybe svaing the rootfs and it contains some content that is tripping
s/svaing/saving/.
up the e2fsprogs mkfs.ext4 populate_rootfs() function
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com>
---
meta/classes/image_types.bbclass | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass b/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
index 9188bed4197..6b4f39ed274 100644
--- a/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
@@ -86,9 +86,14 @@ oe_mkext234fs () {
bbdebug 1 Executing "dd if=/dev/zero
of=${IMGDEPLOYDIR}/${IMAGE_NAME}${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX}.$fstype seek=$ROOTFS_SIZE
count=$COUNT bs=1024"
dd if=/dev/zero
of=${IMGDEPLOYDIR}/${IMAGE_NAME}${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX}.$fstype seek=$ROOTFS_SIZE
count=$COUNT bs=1024
bbdebug 1 "Actual Rootfs size: `du -s ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}`"
- bbdebug 1 "Actual Partion size: `ls -s
${IMGDEPLOYDIR}/${IMAGE_NAME}${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX}.$fstype`"
+ bbdebug 1 "Actual Partion size: `ls -l
${IMGDEPLOYDIR}/${IMAGE_NAME}${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX}.$fstype`"
bbdebug 1 Executing "mkfs.$fstype -F $extra_imagecmd
${IMGDEPLOYDIR}/${IMAGE_NAME}${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX}.$fstype -d ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}"
mkfs.$fstype -F $extra_imagecmd
${IMGDEPLOYDIR}/${IMAGE_NAME}${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX}.$fstype -d ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}
+ if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+ tmp_saved_rootfs=`mktemp -d -p /tmp saved_rootfs.XXXXX`
+ cp -r ${IMAGE_ROOTFS} $tmp_saved_rootfs
Maybe save to ${WORKDIR}/tmp rather than /tmp ?
// Robert
+ fi
+
# Error codes 0-3 indicate successfull operation of fsck (no errors or
errors corrected)
fsck.$fstype -pvfD
${IMGDEPLOYDIR}/${IMAGE_NAME}${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX}.$fstype || [ $? -le 3 ]
}
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
