Op 14 okt. 2011, om 13:42 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 12:47 +0200, Anders Darander wrote: >> * Anders Darander <and...@chargestorm.se> [111014 09:55]: >>> In our local tree, I've circumvented this race by applying a patch like >>> [3]. (Well, we could likely have put the lock in do_make_scripts() >>> instead of module_do_compile(), as we have done currently). Obviously, >>> I'm not proposing to apply this patch, as it depends on lockfile from >>> the procmail-package (host-package). >> >> Just to confirm, it seems (after a very few tests) that it indeed is >> enough to guard the do_make_scripts() with the lock. >> >> However, the question on how to make the real solution remains... > > I've not tested this but it might give you enough info to test > something: > > (Basic idea is to promote that function to a task, then apply a lock to > it).
Or taking a step back, deleting the scripts to save 0.002 kilobytes in sysroot was not a good idea. Shall we just stop deleting them and go back to the old way which actually worked? _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
