On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Phil Blundell <ph...@gnu.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:09 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:02:10PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: >> > Can you add some commentary explaining why this is necessary -- i.e. >> > what exactly is lacking in uClibc to mean it doesn't have "prober TLS >> > support"? >> >> I'm not using uClibc myself and tracking original bbclass in OE-classic >> leads to this commit >> http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/packages/mesa/mesa-tls.inc?id=b527d8f723c98c77f2f5c5358062e5348493d767 >> >> So I'm CCing woglinde and he will probably explain it. > > I see this patch has been applied in the meantime so I guess it's a > slightly academic question now, but I still think it would benefit from > some further explanation.
This patch is no longer needed. Since uclibc now supports TLS/NPTL and we do not support Linuxthreads in OE (starting with oe-core) if we did configure with LT then uclibc does not have TLS implementation that goes with LT but thats a moot point in oe-core > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
