Ok, I will do this in the glibc recipe instead if it’s preferred. Thanks, Jackie
From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 21:38 To: Huang, Jie (Jackie) Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs-postcommands.bbclass: add support for /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf On 29 September 2017 at 03:58, Huang, Jackie (Wind River) <jackie.hu...@windriver.com<mailto:jackie.hu...@windriver.com>> wrote: - This will cause the existing contents of ld.so.conf to be obliterated if the file wasn't empty to begin with. (I know that it is empty in oe-core, but a distro layer might be overlaying this file with its own.) - Also, it seems as though the choice of whether to use an "ld.so.conf.d" arrangement or not is one that the distro should be making. Is there a strong reason why this needs to be done in oe-core? This is easily handled in many ways. Check the include doesn't already exist and concatenate the file instead of overwriting it, for example. Or add the include to the default oe-core ld.so.conf, and distros that want to change ld.so.conf can by changing that file. Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
