On 11 September 2017 at 23:01, Otavio Salvador < otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> > wrote: > > On 11 September 2017 at 22:58, Otavio Salvador > > <otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> > >> wrote: > >> > On 11 September 2017 at 22:33, California Sullivan > >> > <california.l.sulli...@intel.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Bump initramfs-framework PR, as it was missed in the previous > >> >> initramfs-framework patch. > >> > > >> > > >> > There's no need to bump PR. In the ideal world, the PR isn't assigned > >> > at > >> > all. > >> > >> there is, the package moved across arches so adding the PR makes sure > >> it is upgraded. > > > > > > Surely the PR service handles this if you're running a feed. If you're > not > > running a feed then this isn't a problem. > > It does not; it goes back to r0. Changing arch on a package resets the incrementing PR? Isn't that a bug? Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
