On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 09:22, Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote: > Op 5 okt. 2011 om 07:10 heeft Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> het > volgende geschreven: >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 19:00, Richard Purdie >> <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>> Really? hal doesn't really replace udev though, we can just use udev >>> directly in place of it for many things now? >> >> Yes, many moved from hal to udev. >> >>> Specifically which applications are people using with dependencies on >>> hal? As has been pointed out we can fix the xserver and that appears to >>> be the only thing remaining in OE-Core? >> >> OE-Core can be easily hal-less but I just ask for hal to not be >> removed from meta data as I and probably others hasn't finish the move >> to udev yet. > > Put it in your own layer if you need it. No point in keeping obsolete stuff > in oe-core.
I wouldn't call it obsolete as it is still a valid option to Xorg and maybe others. So people might want to use it. I use it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
