On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 12:38 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:28:39PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 09:26 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > this patchset brings meta-oe and oe-core xorg stuff together and most of > > > xorg recipes will be removed from meta-oe (sending another pull request > > > now). > > > > > > This step is needed to be able to separate common x11 to meta-x11 or > > > whatever later. > > > > > > The following changes since commit > > > 96241de59fdf548ae0f80cc9e4668f9ba11924ef: > > > > > > Fix flac build on e500mc cores (2011-09-29 19:31:38 +0100) > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib jansa/x11 > > > > > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=jansa/x11 > > > > > > Martin Jansa (13): > > > xorg-driver: rename .inc files and merge some changes from meta-oe > > > libxft, libxrender, renderproto: add native BBCLASSEXTEND > > > xorg-app-common: merge some changes from meta-oe > > > xf86-video-omapfb: bump SRCREV and add patch from meta-oe > > > rgb: import from meta-oe layer > > > libdrm: improve packaging > > > > I'll take these ones. I've queued them on a master-next branch for now > > as I want to give other people some time to comment on them. If there > > isn't negative feedback I'll take them in ~24 hours. > > > > I've given feedback on why I think these need further work: > > > > > xserver-xf86: upgrade to 1.11.0 and move shared definitions to .inc > > > files > > > xserver-xf86-dri-lite: remove COMPATIBLE_HOST > > > libx11: upgrade to 1.4.4 > > > default-providers: define PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libx11-native > > > xserver-nodm-init: merge some changes from meta-oe > > > glx-use-tls: add from meta-oe layer > > > mesa: upgrade to 7.11 > > I've updated jansa/x11 branch according to your comments, now 17 patches > instead of 7 :). > > Before I send updated pull-request, what do you think about renaming > xserver-xf86 to xserver-xorg which is closer to upstream naming and > that's how it's named in OE-classic and meta-oe? It would make meta-oe > transition easier and better to do it now then convert meta-oe to > xserver-xf86 and then rename it back later.
I'm ok with renaming it. I think the historical reasons for the differences don't matter now. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
