On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 09:27 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> > --- > meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc > b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc > index d51ac64..7ff7891 100644 > --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc > +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libgl ?= "mesa-xlib" > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/update-alternatives ?= > "update-alternatives-cworth" > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/update-alternatives-native ?= "opkg-native" > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libx11 ?= "libx11-trim" > +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libx11-native ?= "libx11-native" > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_xf86-video-intel ?= "xf86-video-intel"
This is a symptom of a problem. Why do we need libx11-trim-native and libx11-diet-native? If the BBCLASSEXTEND is in the right place we don't have this problem... Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
