On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 18:28 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Richard Purdie > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 23:20 -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: > >> From: Tom Rini <tom_r...@mentor.com> > >> > >> At issue is that route/pktloc.c (not generated) depends on > >> route/pktloc_syntax.h (generated). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tom_r...@mentor.com> > >> --- > >> .../libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch | 23 > >> ++++++++++++++++++++ > >> meta/recipes-support/libnl/libnl_2.0.bb | 3 +- > >> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 > >> meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch > >> > >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch > >> b/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000..d396f96 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch > >> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ > >> +--- > > > > Missing patch header... > > How would I mark this when this is an old version of libnl and it > appears not to be a problem the latest version of libnl?
I don't have the patch status field entries handy but you can certainly document that the issue isn't present in version X so its likely been fixed upstream already. I guess "Inappropriate" would cover that if nothing else does. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
