On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 21:49 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 21 sep. 2011, om 21:43 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven: > > > On 9/21/11 2:38 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > >> I'm finally trying to get started with oe-core. I'm using a setup > >> created with the setup-script created by Koen. Everything looks ok until > >> it tried to build cpufrequtils. The recipe tries to fetch the source > >> from a git repo at kernel.org. Obviously, the fetch fails. > >> > >> What is odd, in the "good old days" I would expect this config to fall > >> back and use the Angstrom source mirror, but apparently this is not the > >> case with oe-core. > >> > >> Is this a bug or a feature? If this is a bug, is there a plan to fix it? > >> If it is a feature, how are we supposed to do builds if servers go away? > >> What do we do about GPL compliance? > > > > This is a feature, as people did not want oe-core tied to a given mirror. > > This is the "OE core doesn't generate versioned git tarballs" problem > people keep talking about. I know I can edit each and every recipe to > add ';rebasable=true', but I'd like a global solution before the GPL > police starts looking at the angstrom source mirrors.
Is this a versioned tarball problem or just the tarballs not being generated at all? Are you setting BB_GENERATE_MIRROR_TARBALLS? Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
