On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 12:19 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:09:49AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 10:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > some text here > > > > It took all my restraint to not just reply with: > > """ > > NAK > > > > <insert reason for NAK here, I can't be bothered to type it> > > """ > > > > We've been around in a few circles with this. The problem is that if we > > apply this patch we have no clue which gst-plugin from the good, the bad > > and the ugly provides something you're after to include in an image. > > This results in bitbake being pretty clueless about whether a given > > build will succeed or not. In general I'm not a fan of having > > non-deterministic builds as they tend to annoy users. > > > > If this position isn't acceptable then we'll probably have to move to a > > situation where we list which plugins each of the packages builds and > > drop the dyanmic provides. That is a maintenance pain and I don't take > > that step lightly but I don't see any other options. I'm open to > > suggestions though. > > Something like: > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011-April/031739.html > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011-April/031740.html > ?
Yes. I'd probably have written separate .inc files to simplify the script but I'm thinking along those lines. I'm not particularly happy about it but I don't see many other options. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
