On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:55 -0700, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:45, Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 05:30 -0700, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:39, Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> wrote: > >> /> A future patch will factor out the common parts of init_install_2.0.sh > >> > with init_install 1.0 - this initial patchset essentially just fixes > >> > what's necessary for YOCTO bug #1428 in order to get things working > >> > again. > >> > >> Wouldn't be better to drop 1.0 completely? > >> > > > > You're right, and the original did do that essentially - on second > > thought it was much simpler - I'll resubmit something like that... > > I prefer to have 1.0 dropped since it avoids duplicated maintainence > work and support. Besides, since this is gonna be a base of newer > Yocto we ought to ensure that the layers do get their bsp updated > (even thought I think the only user of it is meta-intel at this > moment). >
Well, my new version handles both grub 0.97 and grub2. We need to keep grub 0.97 around because grub2 is GPLv3. Tom > Nice that you agree with it. > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
