Op 30 aug. 2011, om 11:21 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 10:58 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> The ipkg metadata will look like this now: >> >> koen@dominion:/OE/angstrom-dev/deploy/glibc$ dpkg-deb -I >> ipk/am3517-evm/matrix-gui_1.3-r19.0.6_am3517-evm.ipk >> new debian package, version 2.0. >> size 24112 bytes: control archive= 540 bytes. >> 629 bytes, 13 lines control >> Package: matrix-gui >> Version: 1.3-r19.0.6 >> Description: Matrix GUI for Qt X11 >> Section: multimedia >> Priority: optional >> Maintainer: Angstrom Developers <angstrom-distro-de...@linuxtogo.org> >> License: BSD >> Architecture: am3517-evm >> OE: matrix-gui >> Homepage: https://gforge.ti.com/gf/project/matrix_gui/ >> Build: org.openembedded.dev/f35ab2d >> Depends: matrix-gui-common, libpng12-0, libfreetype6, libz1, >> libgthread-2.0-0, libqtwebkit4, libphonon4, libqtdbus4, libqtxml4, >> libqtgui4, libqtnetwork4, libqtcore4, libglib-2.0-0, libc6, libstdc++6, >> libgcc1 >> Source: >> svn://gforge.ti.com/svn/matrix_gui/;module=trunk;proto=https;user=anonymous;pswd='' >> koen@dominion:/OE/angstrom-dev/deploy/glibc$ >> >> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <k...@openembedded.org> >> Acked-by: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> >> Acked-by: Chase Maupin <chase.mau...@ti.com> >> >> [Ported from .dev/6ae45bbf2b5ca9e4fd7e8b04e461f0bf120dd44d] >> --- >> meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass >> b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass >> index e83aff8..63d7f18 100644 >> --- a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass >> +++ b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass >> @@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ python do_package_ipk () { >> fields.append(["Architecture: %s\n", ['PACKAGE_ARCH']]) >> fields.append(["OE: %s\n", ['PN']]) >> fields.append(["Homepage: %s\n", ['HOMEPAGE']]) >> + fields.append(["Build: %s/%s\n", ['METADATA_BRANCH', >> 'METADATA_REVISION']]) >> >> def pullData(l, d): >> l2 = [] > > How does this cope with our multiple branches and revisions for > different layers? I worry about this being confusing :/
As I said to Paul in a different thread on angstrom-devel, it's up to OE-core to make those variables (more) usefull. Personally I'm happy with the current patch since it gives me a starting point, but long term I'd like metadata_scm.bbclass to represent the layers better in the METADATA_* vars. regards, Koen _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
