On Tuesday 23 August 2011 22:20:55 Klausfpga wrote: > What I wanted to know was what to checkout best: > origin/master/ might not be a good idea, at least last time I tried > this I often fell into inconsistent releases
If you mean the "openembedded" repository, there is the 2011.03-maintenance branch; however this is not the basis for future development. With the Yocto Project release coming up soon, OE-core should be fairly stable (or at least heading that way). > Well with minimalist I meant kernel + base file system + busybox + > package management Busybox is used by default and the rest is of course mandatory. I'm not entirely sure we have an image in OE-core that is just console with package management though; we really ought to sort that out if that's the case. Even so this is trivial to add, you just need "package-management" in the IMAGE_FEATURES for your image. > What I meant here is: Can pypy or somethign else be used in order to > accelerate the execution of BitBake. Not sure; I'm under the impression that Psyco made only a very small difference however. Most of the time taken running BitBake is in the tasks it runs (and the order it runs them); no generic Python tool is going to be able to improve that. Cheers, Paul [1] http://www.yoctoproject.org -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
