On 08/19/2011 09:58 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador<ota...@ossystems.com.br>
---
  meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |    2 +-
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
index a2b10f2..ff3fa46 100644
--- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ python populate_packages_prepend () {
        metapkg = "kernel-modules"
        bb.data.setVar('ALLOW_EMPTY_' + metapkg, "1", d)
        bb.data.setVar('FILES_' + metapkg, "", d)
-       blacklist = [ 'kernel-dev', 'kernel-image', 'kernel-base', 
'kernel-vmlinux', 'perf', 'kernel-misc' ]
+       blacklist = [ 'kernel-dev', 'kernel-image', 'kernel-base', 
'kernel-vmlinux', 'perf', 'perf-dbg', 'kernel-misc' ]
        for l in module_deps.values():
                for i in l:
                        pkg = module_pattern % 
legitimize_package_name(re.match(module_regex, os.path.basename(i)).group(1))

A possible better question is why perf-dbg is getting generated and what's in it?

BTW, as noted elsewhere, it would be good to add additional comments as to why you are doing some of the changes.

Thanks
        Sau!

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to