On Aug 9, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote:

> Richard Purdie wrote on 2011-08-10:
>> If we don't do this, the SDK target sysroot is named generically even
>> when it contains package architecture specific optimisations.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> ---
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/populate_sdk.bbclass
>> b/meta/classes/populate_sdk.bbclass index 0f3591b..8c19e83 100644 ---
>> a/meta/classes/populate_sdk.bbclass +++
>> b/meta/classes/populate_sdk.bbclass @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ SDK_DIR =
>> "${WORKDIR}/sdk"
>> SDK_OUTPUT = "${SDK_DIR}/image"
>> SDK_DEPLOY = "${TMPDIR}/deploy/sdk"
>> -SDKTARGETSYSROOT = "${SDKPATH}/sysroots/${TARGET_SYS}"
>> +SDKTARGETSYSROOT = "${SDKPATH}/sysroots/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}"
> 
> In gcc-configure-sdk.inc, it is set 
> "--with-sysroot=${SDKPATH}/sysroots/${TARGET_SYS}". 
> Is there any inconsistency?

Binutils might also need updating.

- k
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to