On Aug 9, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote: > Richard Purdie wrote on 2011-08-10: >> If we don't do this, the SDK target sysroot is named generically even >> when it contains package architecture specific optimisations. >> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> --- >> diff --git a/meta/classes/populate_sdk.bbclass >> b/meta/classes/populate_sdk.bbclass index 0f3591b..8c19e83 100644 --- >> a/meta/classes/populate_sdk.bbclass +++ >> b/meta/classes/populate_sdk.bbclass @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ SDK_DIR = >> "${WORKDIR}/sdk" >> SDK_OUTPUT = "${SDK_DIR}/image" >> SDK_DEPLOY = "${TMPDIR}/deploy/sdk" >> -SDKTARGETSYSROOT = "${SDKPATH}/sysroots/${TARGET_SYS}" >> +SDKTARGETSYSROOT = "${SDKPATH}/sysroots/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}" > > In gcc-configure-sdk.inc, it is set > "--with-sysroot=${SDKPATH}/sysroots/${TARGET_SYS}". > Is there any inconsistency?
Binutils might also need updating. - k _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core