On Aug 5, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
> meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppce5500.inc | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppce5500.inc
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppce5500.inc
> b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppce5500.inc
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8e6403d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppce5500.inc
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +DEFAULTTUNE ?= "ppce5500"
> +
> +require conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc64.inc
> +
> +TUNEVALID[ppce5500] = "Enable ppce5500 specific processor optimizations"
> +TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "ppce5500",
> "-mcpu=e5500", "", d)}"
> +TUNE_PKGARCH = "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "ppce5500",
> "ppce5500", "${PPCPKGARCH}", d)}"
> +
> +AVAILTUNES += "ppce5500"
> +TUNE_FEATURES_tune-ppce5500 = "m64 ppce5500"
> +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-ppce5500 = "powerpc64 ppce5500"
> +
> +# glibc configure options to get e5500 specific library (for sqrt)
> +GLIBC_EXTRA_OECONF += "--with-cpu=e5500"
> --
> 1.7.3.4
If I want to have a version of this for 32-bit only (or default) and one for
64-bit, how would it be best to handle that?
- k
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
