On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 15:03 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > > [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > > Phil Blundell > > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:50 PM > > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 06/10] kernel, module-base.bbclass: fix > > KERNEL_LD & KERNEL_AR vars > > > > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote: > > > From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kam...@intel.com> > > > > > > KERNEL_LD was using ${LD} in it's definition, which is not correct > > for > > > different ABIs such as x32 or i386 on x86_64 machine. > > > > > > Same with KERNEL_AR var. > > > > Why is ar an issue? That doesn't have any unusual args, does it? > > > > p. > > No special args for ar, but The change makes definition of KERNEL_AR > consistent with other definitions like KERNEL_CC & KERNEL_LD.
Okay, fair enough. Please say that in the checkin message, though. The existing text makes it sound as though KERNEL_AR was actually broken before. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
