On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:54 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 08/03/2011 07:56 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Aug 3, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 14:41 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>> On Aug 3, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Saul Wold wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 08/03/2011 10:00 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> If a SOCKS5 gateway is needed for a proxy access like git it might also >>>>>>> require authentication to the proxy via a password and username. Adding >>>>>>> SOCKS5_USER& SOCKS5_PASSWD to BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE allow for automation >>>>>>> of the authentication request to occur when something like a git fetch >>>>>>> is going through the proxy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala<ga...@kernel.crashing.org> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> * Fixes issue with a git fetch request failing to get pass a firewall >>>>>>> >>>>>>> scripts/oe-buildenv-internal | 2 +- >>>>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/scripts/oe-buildenv-internal b/scripts/oe-buildenv-internal >>>>>>> index c13fc40..b223292 100755 >>>>>>> --- a/scripts/oe-buildenv-internal >>>>>>> +++ b/scripts/oe-buildenv-internal >>>>>>> @@ -55,4 +55,4 @@ unset BITBAKEDIR >>>>>>> export BUILDDIR >>>>>>> export PATH >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -export BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE="MACHINE DISTRO TCMODE TCLIBC http_proxy >>>>>>> ftp_proxy https_proxy all_proxy ALL_PROXY no_proxy SSH_AGENT_PID >>>>>>> SSH_AUTH_SOCK BB_SRCREV_POLICY SDKMACHINE BB_NUMBER_THREADS >>>>>>> PARALLEL_MAKE GIT_PROXY_COMMAND" >>>>>>> +export BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE="MACHINE DISTRO TCMODE TCLIBC http_proxy >>>>>>> ftp_proxy https_proxy all_proxy ALL_PROXY no_proxy SSH_AGENT_PID >>>>>>> SSH_AUTH_SOCK BB_SRCREV_POLICY SDKMACHINE BB_NUMBER_THREADS >>>>>>> PARALLEL_MAKE GIT_PROXY_COMMAND SOCKS5_PASSWD SOCSK5_USER" >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> 1.7.3.4 >>>>>> >>>>>> Ping on this patch >>>>>> >>>>> Kumar, >>>>> >>>>> I think you were asked to modify this patch so that the additinal >>>> SOCKS5_* do not get into sstate, Paul Eggleton provided the >>>> BB_HASHSPACE_WHITELIST info. >>>>> >>>>> Please update this patch >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Sau! >>>> >>>> From the thread it sounded as if that was NOT needed. As nothing >>>> refers to SOCKS5_* we didn't need to add it. Much like how it doesn't >>>> have SSH_AGENT_PID or SSH_AUTH_SOCK in it. >>> >>> It would be good is someone could confirm it but its in the environment >>> so it likely is needed. >> >> Not sure I follow. Confirm what? >> > Kumar, > > I think Richard wants you to confirm that the SSH_* and SOCKS5_* information > is not stored in the shared state hash.
How? - k _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
