On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > Why do we have a split between powerpc-common & powerpc-linux? > > I assume powerpc-linux is used and picked up for powerpc-linux-uclibc in > addition to normal powerpc-linux. > > I'm looking at adding powerpc64 support and powerpc-common is all kinda of > broken for it. I'd like to just merge powerpc-common & powerpc-linux (as > powerpc-linux 32-bit) for now and start a new powerpc-common that refactors > 32/64 commonalities. > > Unless someone says otherwise about the meaning of these files.
powerpc-common is shared between uclibc and eglibc at present and may be shared with other OSes that may build with OE in future. traditionally powerpc-common implicitly implied 32bit so I am not surprised if its broken for ppc64. You could add powerpc64-common and leave 32bit alone. See how its done for mips64 in oe.dev http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tree/site > > - k > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
