Op 1 jun 2011, om 18:03 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven: > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 17:01 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: >> Is there any compelling reason why dbus-native needs to be built >> --with-x? This seems to be causing quite a large stack of native X11 >> packages to get built with, as far as I can tell, no useful result. > > Oh, on the subject of out-of-control dependency chains, my other pet > bugbear at the moment is rpm-native: > > "rpm-native" -> "bzip2-native" > "rpm-native" -> "db-native" > "rpm-native" -> "perl-native" > "rpm-native" -> "openssl-native" > "rpm-native" -> "expat-native" > "rpm-native" -> "autoconf-native" > "rpm-native" -> "automake-native" > "rpm-native" -> "libtool-native" > "rpm-native" -> "gnu-config-native" > "rpm-native" -> "gettext-native" > "rpm-native" -> "python-native" > "rpm-native" -> "acl-native" > "rpm-native" -> "elfutils-native" > "rpm-native" -> "libpcre-native" > "rpm-native" -> "zlib-native" > "rpm-native" -> "popt-native" > "rpm-native" -> "attr-native" > > As far as I can tell, the native rpm is never being used in any way > which requires it to have openssl, and I suspect the same is probably > true for some of the other libs above. Does anybody happen to know what > features rpm-native actually requires for correct operation?
Furthermore, rpm-native seems to get built even if you don't select rpm as package format! regards, Koen _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
