On 04/25/2011 10:35 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Is anyone still using 2.4 kernels? That's what modutils is for,
module-init-tools is for 2.6 kernels
Good question, hence my confusion over the two recipes.
BTW, I just built a 2.4 kernel today, so yes, there are still users...
Op 25 apr. 2011 om 17:49 heeft Saul Wold<s...@linux.intel.com> het volgende
geschreven:
On 04/25/2011 05:02 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 04/23/2011 12:28 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0tetiar?=<yn...@true.cz>
In the current state, udev init script is loaded as 3rd and
modutils.sh as
20th, so udevadm called in udev init script loads all kernel modules
in some
unpredictable order, not honoring in any way specified order of
modules in
/etc/modules. This causes some troubles mainly in the first boot. So
to fix
this we now move loading of the kernel modules just before we exec
udev init
script. Example of the current state:
Starting udev
rtc-m48t86 rtc-m48t86: rtc core: registered m48t86 as rtc0
rtc-m48t86 rtc-m48t86: battery ok
ep93xx-rtc ep93xx-rtc: rtc core: registered ep93xx-rtc as rtc1
root@ts72xx:~# cat /etc/modules
rtc-ep93xx
ohci-hcd
ts72xx_sbcinfo
rtc-m48t86
As you can guess, this is really wrong behaviour, because I've rtc1 as
the
main time source for my system.
root@ts72xx:~# cat /etc/default/hwclock
HWCLOCKACCESS=yes
HWCLOCKDEVICE=/dev/rtc1
Expected behaviour with this patch applied:
Please wait: booting...
ep93xx-rtc ep93xx-rtc: rtc core: registered ep93xx-rtc as rtc0
usbcore: registered new device driver usb
ohci_hcd: USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver
...
rtc-m48t86 rtc-m48t86: rtc core: registered m48t86 as rtc1
rtc-m48t86 rtc-m48t86: battery ok
Starting udev
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar<yn...@true.cz>
(based on http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/1917/)
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<k...@dominion.thruhere.net>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold<s...@linux.intel.com>
---
.../modutils/modutils-initscripts.bb | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils-initscripts.bb
b/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils-initscripts.bb
index 1665955..5ae34b4 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils-initscripts.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils-initscripts.bb
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ LICENSE = "PD"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=7bf87fc37976e93ec66ad84fac58c098"
SRC_URI = "file://modutils.sh \
file://PD.patch"
-PR = "r4"
+PR = "r5"
INITSCRIPT_NAME = "modutils.sh"
-INITSCRIPT_PARAMS = "start 20 S ."
+INITSCRIPT_PARAMS = "start 2 S ."
inherit update-rc.d
Should there not be a corresponding change to modutils_2.4.27.bb? It's
not clear to me
where there are these two separate recipes, but they should at least be
kept in sync.
Gary,
Could you please resend this as a proper patch with Signed-off-by and commit
info.
Thanks
Sau!
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils_2.4.27.bb
b/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils_2.4.27.bb
index 1ebc90c..2944201 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils_2.4.27.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils_2.4.27.bb
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ manageable for all users, administrators and
distribution maintainers."
LICENSE = "GPLv2"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=8ca43cbc842c2336e835926c2166c28b"
DEPENDS = "bison-native"
-PR = "r9"
+PR = "r10"
SRC_URI =
"${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/modutils-${PV}.tar.bz2
\
file://lex.l.diff;patch=1 \
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ if test -n "$D"; then
done
fi
fi
-update-rc.d $D modutils.sh start 20 S .
+update-rc.d $D modutils.sh start 2 S .
}
pkg_prerm_modutils () {
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
