If you're only sampling 20 conformers, it's unlikely to be a global minima. It 
will usually be a lower energy conformer than what you started.

Does it need to be further optimized? Well, usually yes, but it depends - the 
weighted search option does minimize with the MMFF94 force field by default - 
but whether it needs further optimization depends on your needs. My research 
group, for example, typically does density functional or other quantum chemical 
calculation - so a MMFF94 geometry is only a starting point.

Hope that helps,
-Geoff

---
Prof. Geoffrey Hutchison
Department of Chemistry
University of Pittsburgh
tel: (412) 648-0492
email: geo...@pitt.edu
twitter: @ghutchis
web: https://hutchison.chem.pitt.edu/

> On Sep 18, 2019, at 3:37 AM, 20520181152...@stu.xmu.edu.cn wrote:
> 
> Thank you for reading this email.I have a question to confirm:
> I want to get the 3D coordinates of the molecules,after operations just like 
> your example:
> 
>               obabel ligand.babel.smi -O ligand.babel.sdf --gen3d --conformer 
> --nconf 20 --weighted
>       
> 
> 
>                Can we think of this conformation as the most stable 
> conformation of the molecule which is the global  minimum conformation of the 
> molecule? Does it need to be optimized if I need use the conformation for 
> futher computer ?
>       
> 
> 
>               I shall be most grateful if I receive your letter !
>       
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
> OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss

_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss

Reply via email to