While GAFF, MMFF94 and other force fields attempt to replicate heats of 
formation, the heat for formation of an organic molecule need not always be 
negative. 

(Consider, for example cyclobutane, which is perfectly stable but has a 
positive DeltaG.)
https://www2.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/reusch/virttxtjml/energy1.htm

Hope that helps,
-Geoff
---
Prof. Geoffrey Hutchison
Department of Chemistry
University of Pittsburgh
tel: (412) 648-0492
email: geo...@pitt.edu
web: http://hutchison.chem.pitt.edu/

> I've tried for several sets of conformers (X-ray, minimized, 2D),
> various input formats (sdf, mol2) and various forcefields and in most
> cases I get the positive values of the Total Energy. Is it OK? The trend
> is correct (more optimal geometries has lower energies than not optimal
> geometries) but still, I would assume to get negative values for good
> conformers.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss

Reply via email to