I think it would be easy to add as a general option to all filters. Chris? In the meanwhile, "wc -l" will work I guess (needs Cygwin on windows).
- Noel On 8 August 2013 09:38, Pascal Muller <pascal.jm.mul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> If obabel does it, it always does it better: >> >> (...) > > > Ok... I need to think to the -s option instead of obgrep, then. > I found the -v option (invert the matching), but is there an equivalent to > the obgrep -c option (number of matches)? > > >> >> I'm in favour of replacing all obgrep, etc. with symlinks to obabel. > > > Maybe a good idea. > > Many thanks, > Pascal > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! > It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. > Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. > Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > OpenBabel-discuss mailing list > OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-discuss mailing list OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss
