> Isn't there some way to turn down the VdW via a distance cutoff or so?
(EnableCutOff and SetVdWCutoff) I've never used these but hopefully they
will prevent the pairwise generation of all of the VdW terms.

Curiously, this doesn't work. Enabling the cutoffs and setting to very small
values still runs into the same memory problems. I may be wrong, but it
seems that in forcefielduff.cpp:1417, if the atoms are not in _interGroups
then the BitIsOn set by the cutoff will not be checked and
SetupVDWCalculation is still called for every pair. I assume that the groups
are not automatically generated? Fortunately, in my case, I have worked out
that creating an OBConstraints and AddIgnore for every atom does exclude
them from the vdW, but maybe this is a bug?

Tom




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss

Reply via email to