Hi Chris,
thx for the fast reply > Hi, unfortunately it doesn't look like this is going to work with any > easy fix. thx for the info. Doesnt sound like there is a fix approaching in the next time, so I think I will have to stick with the 32bit kernel and have to change the VMSPLIT to 2/2 as I encounter massive IO Perfomance Issues with a big amount of RAM. > > It looks to me like the netlink message protocol between iscsid and > the kernel isn't actually functional for this :( > > The struct iscsi_uevent differs in size between 32 and 64 bit > architectures due to internal padding for alignment. It's so close > to being safe that it's pretty frustrating to find this. The > iscsi_uevent.u union is padded out from 20 to 24 bytes, shifting the > kernel response (iscsi_uevent.r) by 4 bytes. what do you think would be the best solution to fix this? maybe I can help out. I already have a test system up and running ;) Greetz loomy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
