We’re stripping the 029s. Am I missing a reason why we should be keeping them?
Mary Mary Llewellyn Database Manager Bibliomation, Inc. 24 Wooster Ave. Waterbury, CT 06708 mllew...@biblio.org From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Dea Nowell Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:58 PM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the system? If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record. We just discovered this with our system (Sage Library System) recently with a different field. Once we removed the field from those that were being stripped on import we were able to have the field saved in the bib. Just a thought to explore & it may address Don's query as well, I'm not sure. - Dea Nowell _______________________________ UCSLD logo & tagline ___________________________________ Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager Umatilla County Special Library District 17 SW Frazer, Suite 360 P O Box 1689 Pendleton OR 97801 (541) 966-0917 --> (406) 952-4049 email: d...@ucsld.org || web: www.ucsld.org On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote: I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I was not able to add an 029 An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for records from non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and Archives Canada, the British Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners vendors, etc.). OCLC uses these numbers to process and track records from other systems.” http://www.oclc.org/bib formats/en/0xx/029.html <http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/029.html> . Not sure why it doesn’t retain on save. An 019, which is another field specific to OCLC, does (see http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html). 029 seems to be system supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied… Elaine J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304 404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Donald Butterworth Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 Hi Everyone, As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control number fields to a MARC record. It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new search. It also never shows on the MARC View screen. What do we need to do to add these fields? Thanks! Don -- Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher Library Asbury Theological Seminary don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu (859) 858-2227
