I need to think more about catalog but I completely agree to not using I frames.
I would also +1 what Terran has On May 1, 2014 2:22 PM, "McCanna, Terran" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>As I recall, the primary impetus for absorbing the catalog into the > staff client was that it allows staff to see what patrons see. << > > I can understand that, but the staff aren't really seeing exactly what the > patrons see right now (at least, not in our implementation). The staff see > items in the search results that are hidden from patrons (Lost items, > etc.), the staff see copy & volume level hold options that the patrons > don't see, and the patrons see header/banner information that the staff > don't see. > > However, I can also understand why it would be confusing for staff if the > client catalog were vastly different from the OPAC. > > > I will send out some feelers to our library staff to see what they think. > > > Terran McCanna > PINES Program Manager > Georgia Public Library Service > 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 > Atlanta, GA 30345 > 404-235-7138 > [email protected] > >
