Justin, The reason that search is slow is that you're effectively asking the system to return all bib records, then pull up all their copies, then pull up those copies' shelving locations, and finally filter out records that do not have copies that do not have shelving locations in your list. That is exactly the reason I built the new items functionality.
With a little elbow grease, one could certainly use one of the many XML format output options available for use with the new items list to re-sort them however one would like, and display them exactly as one would wish. Just try replacing "html-full" with "atom" or "rss2". In fact, you could even use the OPAC to do the heavy lifting for you if you were to extract the record IDs from the XML new item feed and built a search using the record_list() filter and the sort(titlesort) operator. Perhaps, with likely less total effort, an opac format could be added to the new item list, along with support for additional query components (such as sorting) in the case of the opac format. A simple redirect would do. A wishlist bug sounds like a good idea. Perhaps time or funding will materialize. On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Holly Brennan <[email protected]> wrote: > "This improves the presentation and allows for title sorting but the search > takes *forever* to return and the results are always way off and frequently > do not return any results at all. Having just tried it, TPAC claims there > are no results whatsoever. Two or three page refreshes later it turns up 353 > items. According to the DB we have 1951 distinct bibs with items in those > locations. > > > > Has anyone else seen this behavior? Is there an open bug on it? Should there > be?" > > > > Weird. We, too, use "New Books" as a location for searching. I just pulled > up the whole batch of new adult books in our library (5,070 records) without > a problem. It took maybe one second to load the page. > > > > I didn't find a delay using your search method, either. > > > > I know this is sort of non-information, but it could be helpful so I chimed > in. Let us know if you solve the problem! > > > > -Holly > > > > > > > > Holly Brennan > > Library Technology Specialist > > Homer Public Library > > 907-235-3180 (main) > > 907-435-3154 (direct) > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Justin Hopkins > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 12:56 PM > To: Evergreen Discussion Group > Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Inconsistent/wrong search results when searching > by location in TPAC > > > > Hi guys, > > > > Like probably many others, we have noticed that Evergreen is lacking a > really good "new books" feature. We've explored this: > > > > http://missourievergreen.org/opac/extras/browse/html-full/item-age/SRLWA > > > > The presentation of this option isn't very good though, and ideally we'd > have the ability to sort by title. > > > > It just so happens that our library who is most interested in this has a > shelving location at each of their branches called New Books. So we tried > this approach using search syntax: > > > > http://missourievergreen.org/eg/opac/results?fi:item_type=&query=locations(1307,1308,1309,1310,1311,1558,1559)+&qtype=keyword&locg=174&sort=titlesort) > > > > This improves the presentation and allows for title sorting but the search > takes *forever* to return and the results are always way off and frequently > do not return any results at all. Having just tried it, TPAC claims there > are no results whatsoever. Two or three page refreshes later it turns up 353 > items. According to the DB we have 1951 distinct bibs with items in those > locations. > > > > Has anyone else seen this behavior? Is there an open bug on it? Should there > be? > > Regards, > > Justin > > > > -- Mike Rylander | Director of Research and Development | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [email protected] | web: http://www.esilibrary.com
