That did it! Thanks for the help. Patrick
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Ben Shum <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > Since it's marked "pending" state, now I'm wondering if maybe you need to > have the action_trigger_runner.pl script going as well to actually > translate events using the PO JEDI template. > > In our utility server, the action/trigger runner goes off every quarter > hour, and then we have edi_pusher.pl set to run once per hour at 10 after > the hour. So presumably, the action/trigger runner has enough time to > process things out prior to each push action. > > -- Ben > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Patrick Gardella < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for the response, Ben! >> >> EDI messages were blank for each of the POs until I did the manual >> trigger for the two recent POs. It always showed (0) for EDI Messages in >> the client and had nothing in the DB. So right now, I have two messages in >> the edi_messages table. >> >> All of the action_trigger.event records with an event_def of 23 are >> "pending": >> 6732 >> 424 >> 23 >> 2013-09-26 17:37:11.76534+002013-09-26 17:37:11+00*NULL**NULL* *NULL** >> NULL*pending*NULL**NULL* *NULL**NULL* >> So it seems to me that the event never fires. >> >> Patrick >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Ben Shum <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Patrick, >>> >>> Have you checked the EDI messages to see if it generated anything? >>> It's possible that there was an error or issue with the order >>> processing as generated based on the PO JEDI and it's just stuck on >>> that. Alternatively, one could check the action_trigger.event table >>> in the database and see if the associated EDI generated message failed >>> to create with a proper template as well. Presumably, they would have >>> an associated event_def of 23 (which seems to be the ID for your PO >>> JEDI action trigger template). >>> >>> In my system, on B&T orders handled with EDI, I can see that there are >>> listed EDI messages associated with the PO. Clicking on that link >>> takes me to view the messages as processed. I would expect multiple >>> messages normally, one when using edi_pusher.pl to send the content on >>> its way, and then later messages with edi_fetcher.pl when retrieving >>> back the processed files on B&T's end of things via the FTP. >>> >>> -- Ben >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Patrick Gardella >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Back in July, Rob asked for assistance in setting up EDI to BT and YBP. >>> > >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.education.libraries.open-ils.general/8465/focus=8470 >>> > >>> > As he said there, we believe we have it set up correctly. We can FTP >>> into >>> > the ftp servers for BT using the credentials configured in the EDI >>> Accounts. >>> > Those same EDI Accounts are then referenced in the Providers list (EDI >>> > Default filed). >>> > >>> > We created a PO for one book as a test to BT, but there is absolutely >>> no >>> > indication the file was actually sent to BT. No messages show up in >>> the PO. >>> > Ditto for the YBP one, but I want to focus on just one of these for >>> now. >>> > >>> > The PO has been activated as well. >>> > >>> > edi_pusher.pl is set to run every 10 minutes. When run by hand, it >>> shows: >>> > >>> > opensrf@evergreen:/openils/var/log$ cd /openils/bin && /usr/bin/perl >>> > ./edi_pusher.pl >>> > FTP_PASSIVE is OFF >>> > >>> > Hook 'acqpo.activated' is used in 1 event definition(s): >>> > 23 - 'PO JEDI' >>> > Event definition 23 has 0 (completed) event(s) >>> > >>> > done >>> > >>> > We're running Evergreen 2.4.2. >>> > >>> > Can anyone offer any suggestions on what might be going on? Is there >>> > something we need to do to make the order actually transmit? Or some >>> log we >>> > can look in to figure out what is happening with this order? >>> > >>> > Patrick Gardella >>> > Asbury Theological Seminary >>> >> >> >
