https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437401
ramon diaz-uriarte <rdia...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REPORTED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
--- Comment #8 from ramon diaz-uriarte <rdia...@gmail.com> ---
Thanks. I haven't been able to test with another stylus, but things are OK
(much smoother) with the mouse, so I guess this is a stylus issue as you
suggested.
I guess we can close this, so I am setting status to "resolved", "not a bug".
Apologies for the noise with this report.
(In reply to David Hurka from comment #7)
> Thanks. I don’t think these screenshots indicate a systematic jitter, but
> just the natural jitter of a physical object.
>
> After reading this more carefully:
>
> > - That same annotation, displayed in another PDF viewer, does not
> > look as jagged, but it is more jagged than annotations done
> > with other apps (e.g., Xodo or Adobe Acrobat Reader DC).
>
> I think that Poppler (Okular’s backend) renders the annotation with
> miter-join line style, while other renderers use round-join. Round-join can
> not make spikes.
>
> > but it is more jagged than annotations done
> > with other apps (e.g., Xodo or Adobe Acrobat Reader DC).
>
> Other apps maybe ignore points that are very close to each other, which
> additionally reduces jitter.
>
> You can test that by slowly drawing a diagonal line with the mouse. My
> Okular creates a staircase line instead of one smooth diagonal line, which
> means that all points of my mouse movement are included. (One pixel up, one
> pixel right, one pixel up, ...)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
