ngraham added a comment.

  In T10243#206539 <https://phabricator.kde.org/T10243#206539>, @alex-l wrote:
  
  > Thank you for your replies. As I said I discussed a new icon for Activities 
time ago but Ivan decided to stay with the 3-dots one. I can't always be around 
to check that previous decisions aren't overwritten by others. Isn't up to 
others to check if there were previous discussions on an icon?
  
  
  In any project, every single change can be seen as overriding a previous 
decision. Like I said, if you want previous decisions to have more weight, you 
or someone else needs to be around to provide the context, remember the 
discussion, bring up alternatives, etc. Previous decisions are not self-evident 
and self-enforcing, especially when the result is something that is problematic 
or accumulates complaints from users or developers. The hardest decisions to 
enforce in absentia are those that resulted in an imperfect compromise.
  
  > The one on the Activities icon is somewhere here on Phabricator. Found: 
https://phabricator.kde.org/M90
  
  Unfortunately Phab search is so horrible that if you hadn't linked to it 
directly, there's no chance I would have ever found it even if I was 
specifically looking for it. :(
  
  > The most important rule in my opinion in VDG was: don't change things just 
for the sake of changing.
  
  This is a strong pet peeve of mine and I agree 100%. As a result, we never do 
this; every change is because we think the change is a positive improvement.
  
  For example we changed the activities icon because otherwise the icon it was 
using before was 1) used in other contexts, 2) nondescript and meaningless, and 
3) monochrome when we were trying to consistently use colorful icons for System 
Settings KCMs. This are not "chang[ing] things just for the sake of changing"; 
those are three good reasons. Maybe the result isn't amazing. I wouldn't say 
it's my favorite icon either. But doing something for good reasons and failing 
is not the same thing as doing thing for no good reason, such as because we're 
bored and restless, because we like changing things around to justify our 
existence, or because we feel the need to chase design trends. I constantly 
push back on proposals that I believe originate from one of these reasons.
  
  > In fact the current Dolphin, Gwenview, System Settings and other icons were 
designed for personal use by me but other VDG members noticed them from my 
screenshots and asked to submit them, despite the rule of not changing things. 
It is a matter of attitude: if there is broad agreement to update an icon then 
proceed. If you are not sure, keep everything as it is, trusting the previous 
designers who probably took that decision for reasons.
  
  When it comes to app icons, the VDG has in fact settled on a fairly strict 
guideline for apps that already have icons: don't erode the app's pre-existing 
branding; just make a Breeze-ey version of the icon. If you do want to make a 
Breeze icon that's substantially different from the app's existing icon, you 
need to have a conversation with the app's maintainer and/or developers to 
formally change the app's official icon to your new icon.
  
  Various Breeze icons violate this guideline, to the point where the apps' 
developers reject them in favor of the old ones (for example, Okular and Kile). 
That's ultimately the point of this task: to improve the breeze icons for 
various apps of ours so that they 1) look better, 2) match the branding 
guidelines we've set out, and 3) become accepted by the apps' developers.
  
  > One single person who gives the OK to update the icon for a core KDE app? 
It's the opposite of our previous attitude...
  
  That's a fair point. In general we should probably be more conservative when 
it comes to approvals. This requires more people with the time and willingness 
to review patches, of course. :). And node that for the two app icons we have 
changed so far--Kolf and Kile--we did seek and receive the approval of the 
apps' maintainers.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/T10243

To: ngraham
Cc: Leon0402, IohannesPetros, alex-l, starbuck, cullmann, IlyaBizyaev, arrowd, 
abetts, stikonas, knauss, mglb, filipf, mludwig, aacid, lesliezhai, 
elvisangelaccio, kossebau, trickyricky26, ndavis, yurchor, #kde_games, #ark, 
#kde_pim, #discover_software_store, #yakuake, #kate, #okular, #gwenview, 
#konsole, #kde_applications, #vdg, ngraham, cblack, konkinartem, ian, jguidon, 
hannahk, Ghost6, jraleigh, MrPepe, fbampaloukas, squeakypancakes, alexde, GB_2, 
crozbo, firef, alexeymin, skadinna, genaxxx, aaronhoneycutt, jriddell, 
mbohlender

Reply via email to