> On July 21, 2013, 4:18 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > At Akademy we held a BoF about Okular, this is the conclusion we reached, > > it is a good idea to show the TOC if there's one, no need for the checkbox > > > > Can you update the code to do that?
I certainly can, but another possibility could be to keep the checkbox to allow users to keep the previous behavior. - Stefan ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111036/#review36259 ----------------------------------------------------------- On June 15, 2013, 9:47 a.m., Stefan Radermacher wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111036/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 15, 2013, 9:47 a.m.) > > > Review request for Okular. > > > Description > ------- > > This is a proposed implementation of the feature request I made in bug report > #321169. > > > This addresses bug 321169. > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=321169 > > > Diffs > ----- > > conf/dlggeneralbase.ui f2c9efd > conf/okular.kcfg 1e23d61 > part.h 4b3aafd > part.cpp 10b9e6f > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111036/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Stefan Radermacher > >
_______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
