A Divendres 11 Desembre 2009 16:12:31, John Culleton va escriure: > On Friday 11 December 2009 11:33:56 Pino Toscano wrote: > > Alle venerdì 11 dicembre 2009, John Culleton ha scritto: > > > Is it possible for the developers to simply recompile the > > latest > > > > version of Kpdf 3.5 against the Qt 4 libraries? > > > > It needs porting to the Qt 4, and that porting is called Okular. > > > > > That would be a good > > > solution for those of us who really just need the capabilities, > > and the > > > > reliability, of that program. > > > > Any concrete example, excluding printing? > > No, but that for me is enough. The virtue of Okular and its > predecessor, kpdf, for my workflow is the automatic update > of the file when the underlying pdf file is updated. Adobe Reader > won't do that. But Okular has printing problems, at least on my > system. I don't propose a Qt4 version of Kpdf as a long term > solution but as a quick fix. The required changes should be > minimal, which should mean a minimum of debugging. In > addition to the printing problem I see lots of otherOkular bug > reports. That is to be expected in a major revision with many new > features. > > I could I suppose download the KDE3 libraries and run Kpdf but > two sets of libraries with similar or identical file names could > mess things up for other apps. If QT4 is a proper superset of QT3 > my proposal is feasible. If not, maybe not. >
Okular is [almost] perfect regarding printing, the problem is in Qt4 libraries that suck regarding to printing, but updating Kpdf to Qt4 will give you the same exact behaviour. Albert _______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
