> > On the "Go"-menu, it should not say "Back/Forward in Document". It is > > confusing because it depends on which direction you arrived at the > > current page. > > > > Instead, it could say "Forward in page history" and "Backward in page > > history". Or "Back" and "Next", as I have seen in web-browsers. > > I agree there, the current oxygen icons aren't helping either, so > distinguishing between "back one page" and "back in the browsing > history" should be as concise as possible.
Luckly (or sadly, as it does not depend on us) having proper icons would help a bit. > However I have a feeling that > the wording of "Forward in page history" and "Backward in page history" > could be improved as the entries consist of too many elements that > together may lead to confusion. In addition translations may get fairly > long. What about "Step backward" and "Step forward" instead? I'm all for improvements of those wordings, they were added by me in a sort of "need" to distinguish the two kind of back/forward. > Maybe including menu entries from embedded kparts in Konqueror isn't > such a good idea then. I am rather tired and frustrated that interaction > design decisions regarding Okular as a document reader have to be plain > bad because of possible issues with the kpart in Konqueror. This leads > to some pretty bad wording in menu entries but also a poor choice of > shortcuts. I can agree that there are potential issues; though, having just Back/Forward in konqueror and Back/Forward in Okular could be a problem, as the user would expect both the kind of actions to behave at the same way. Having back/forward in konqueror is sort of necessary, otherwise if you open a document you can't go back to what were you doing before. Having back/forward in okular... makes you able to go to another page ;) -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
