On +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:51:52AM +0000, Jethro Tull wrote: > > > is there any reason it doesn't use the "Message-ID" in the email header? > > Yes, this header is not reliable enough. It's not so rare to have more > than one email for one Message-ID. > > > would it be possible to add this feature? > > As an option, yes. I don't intend to implement this feature myself, > though. Patches are welcome. > > -- > Nicolas Sebrecht
ok... do you have an idea of the weight of the work of adding this feature. I have never looked into the code of offlineimap but i could still try. Anyway, i'm still surprised that neither offlineimap nor mbsync have this feature while mutt uses it by default. I asked in mbsync mailing list the same feature and they replied the same as you, i.e. not planned and patches welcome. _______________________________________________ OfflineIMAP-project mailing list: OfflineIMAP-project@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/offlineimap-project OfflineIMAP homepages: - https://github.com/OfflineIMAP - http://offlineimap.org
