It looks like this was fixed in 11.2.0.2, so yes, 10.2.0.4 and older needed the datavolume option.

Thanks,
Herbert.

On 11/01/2012 04:55 PM, Pravin K Patil wrote:
So does this mean, this option was required for 10g (10.2.0.4) only? Just collecting more points for discussion on this point.

Regards,
Pravin

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com <mailto:herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com>> wrote:

    Pravin,

    With that database version you do not need the datavolume option
    in 1.4 or 1.6.

    Thanks,
    Herbert.


    On 10/31/12 3:16 PM, Pravin K Patil wrote:
    yes, we use OCFS2 to store Oracle database files and Oracle
    database version is 11.2.0.2 and we are upgrading it to 11.2.0.3
    before we are ready to switch from OCFS2 1.4 to 1.6

    Regards,
    Pravin

    On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Herbert van den Bergh
    <herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com
    <mailto:herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com>> wrote:

        Pravin,

        Are you using OCFS2 to store Oracle database files?  What
        database version do you use?

        Thanks,
        Herbert.


        On 10/31/12 11:45 AM, Pravin K Patil wrote:
        Just attaching the guide which is by Sunil, refer to page 43
        and it says to use the datavolume option but the man page of
        mount.ocfs2 says that its depricated parameter. below is
        details form man page of mount .ocfs2

        datavolume

                      This mount option has been deprecated. It has
        been used in the past, to force  the  Oracle  RDBMS  to

                      issue  direct  IOs  to  the  hosted  data
        files, control files, redo logs, archive logs, voting disk,

                      cluster registry, etc. It has been deprecated
        because it is no longer required.  Oracle  RDBMS  users

                      should instead use the init.ora parameter,
        filesystemio_options, to enable direct IOs.


        Just want to be cautious of what we use.

        Regards,
        Pravin

        On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Herbert van den Bergh
        <herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com
        <mailto:herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com>> wrote:

            Yes, I'm pretty sure that should be fine.


            On Oct 30, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Pravin K Patil
            <pravinkpa...@gmail.com <mailto:pravinkpa...@gmail.com>>
            wrote:

            thanks for quick response, so does this mean, we can
            even remove that option on current 1.4 OCFS2 and
            prepare new host also without this option and we swing
            the storage and we should be fine?

            Regards,
            Pravin

            On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Herbert van den Bergh
            <herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com
            <mailto:herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com>> wrote:

                The datavolume option didn't really do much.  It
                just changed the filesystem identifier from OCFS2
                to OCFS V1, so some programs which shall not be
                named would detect it as OCFS and do something
                special.  Those programs have long since been
                fixed.  And there's absolutely no other functional
                behavior change with or without the parameter.

                Thanks,
                Herbert.


                On 10/30/12 8:08 AM, Pravin K Patil wrote:
                Hi All,

                While building new servers, we just noticed that
                on new servers which are SLES11 SP2 and OCFS2 1.6
                there is no option for mount as datavolume
                All our file system which have oracle data files
                are mounted with this option in current system
                which is SLES10 SP4 and OCFS 1.4

                So when we swing the storage, we will have to be
                careful of this mount option. Any suggestions?

                Regards,
                Pravin

                On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Pravin K Patil
                <pravinkpa...@gmail.com
                <mailto:pravinkpa...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                    Thanks a lot for all the responses, I will
                    reply back with practical experience in few weeks.

                    Pravin


                    On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Tiger Yang
                    <tiger.y...@oracle.com
                    <mailto:tiger.y...@oracle.com>> wrote:

                        1.6 could recoginze 1.4 format, but after
                        moving to the new server,  maybe need
                        enable new features which only supported
                        by 1.6 via tunefs.ocfs2.

                        Thanks,
                        Tiger


                        On 10/26/2012 01:19 AM, Pravin K Patil wrote:
                        Hi,

                        We have current Oracle RAC running with
                        OCFS2 1.4.2 on SLES10 SP4 servers.
                        we are building new RAC nodes with SLES11
                        SP2 which will have OCFS2 1.6

                        We plan to just represent the storage
                        from current HW to new HW and expect the
                        new server to recognize all FS and let
                        Oracle start RAC instances.

                        Are there any steps required after/before
                        presenting the storage to new server.

                        Regards,
                        Pravin


                        _______________________________________________
                        Ocfs2-users mailing list
                        Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com  
<mailto:Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com>
                        https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users





                _______________________________________________
                Ocfs2-users mailing list
                Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com  <mailto:Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com>
                https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users







_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users

Reply via email to