Reducing node-slots frees up the journal and distributes the metadata that that slot was tracking to the remaining slots. I am not aware of any reason why there should be an impact.
On 11/16/2011 03:07 PM, David wrote: > I did read the man page for tunefs.ocfs2 but I didn't see anything indicating > what the impact to the fs would be when making a change to an existing fs > such as reducing the node slots. > > Anyway, thank you for the feedback, I was able to make the changes with no > impact to the fs. > > David > > On 11/16/2011 12:12 PM, Sunil Mushran wrote: >> man tunefs.ocfs2 >> >> It cannot be done in an active cluster. But it can be done without having to >> reformat the volume. >> >> On 11/16/2011 10:08 AM, David wrote: >>> I wasn't able to find any documentation that answers whether or not the >>> number of nodes defined for a cluster, can be reduced on an active >>> cluster as seen via: >>> >>> tunefs.ocfs2 -Q "%B %T %N\n" >>> >>> Does anyone know if this can be done, or do I have to copy the data off >>> of the fs, make the changes, reformat the fs and copy the data back? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ocfs2-users mailing list >>> Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com >>> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users >> _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
