This question actually isn't about CIMD here! I've been working with a team on 
a low-level OAuth implementation for Swift, and I just happened to notice that 
we'd hardcoded grant types whilst writing the client, and I went to try to find 
information on a registry of grant types, because I knew that was an extension 
point, but couldn't find one.

Feels a bit odd not to have a well known registry of grant types and their 
corresponding specifications.

– Emelia

> On 5 Mar 2026, at 20:02, Lombardo, Jeff <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> That is what I tried to propose to OSW and former IETF meetings through: 
> https://github.com/identitymonk/draft-lombardo-oauth-client-extension-claims
> 
> it was for Claims in tokens but surely would applied to CIMD which I what I 
> think you point at too on top of OAuth 2.1
> 
> 
> 
> Jean-François “Jeff” Lombardo | Amazon Web Services
> 
> Architecte Principal de Solutions, Spécialiste de Sécurité
> Principal Solution Architect, Security Specialist
> Montréal, Canada
> 
> Commentaires à propos de notre échange? Exprimez-vous ici.
> 
> Thoughts on our interaction? Provide feedback here.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emelia S. <[email protected]> 
> Sent: March 5, 2026 1:32 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [EXT] [OAUTH-WG] Is there an IANA Registry for Grant Types?
> 
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
> links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the 
> content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur externe. Ne 
> cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne pouvez pas 
> confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain que le 
> contenu ne présente aucun risque.
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I just noticed that there doesn't seem to be an explicit registry of OAuth 
> Grant Types defined anywhere, should there be such a registry kept with IANA 
> for standardized grant types?
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-8.3
> 
>> Defining New Authorization Grant Types New authorization grant types 
>> can be defined by assigning them a unique absolute URI for use with the 
>> "grant_type" parameter. If the extension grant type requires additional 
>> token endpoint parameters, they MUST be registered in the OAuth Parameters 
>> registry as described by Section 11.2.
> 
> This just says the additional parameters must be registered, but nothing 
> about the grant type itself besides it must be an absolute URI (urn's are 
> often used).
> 
> Would it be worth defining an explicit registry with IANA as part of OAuth 
> 2.1?
> 
> Yours,
> Emelia Smith
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to